8.26.2004

so who is lame in this scenario? the dude who plays this game? the company who makes it? the product itself? me for caring?

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

This game has the same basic premise.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view.php?id=66766

Sure its lame, but theoretically, a game which simulates throwing a wad of paper into a wastebasket is lame too. but its fun right?

Anonymous said...

I don't understand. You have to take care of her and keep her happy and satisfied with you, and then no rewards?? That is one cyberbeotch

Anonymous said...

maybe that's the point. realism.

Jordan said...

heheheh, the difference is one game requires that you spend REAL MONEY on a fake person, the other game only requires real time... of course time is money... and girls = time * money. so girls = money * money or money^2. And we all know that money = the root of all evil so evil = money^2 so girls = evil. so maybe fake girls are a good idea after all.

Anonymous said...

just because she's fake doesn't mean that the love i feel for her isn't real. she's worth every penny.
jdm